- animation
- Indicator Icon with Extensions
- Action Icons without Extensions
- shape
- shape+line
- line
which version do we prefer about the Icon itself
- RO: concept 2 and 1 have the most conrtast scope, so the user can clearly differentiate between :enable and :active. concept 2 closes the gap between body and line.
- WD: like the simplicity of 1
- but I don't like the differences between shape, shape+line and line:
- with this we add again complexity: every new icon: how to color those to keep it consequent?
- with this we add again inconsequences
- not every icon follows the same styling and demands making choices in the creation process.
- going from huge difference in shape
vs small differences in line
- going from huge difference in shape
- not every icon follows the same styling and demands making choices in the creation process.
- with this we add again complexity: every new icon: how to color those to keep it consequent?
- but I don't like the differences between shape, shape+line and line:
- WD: the propositions 2-3 with shadows
- are unclear to me and I had the feeling that I need glasses (blurry effect)
- line objects which shadows are very unclear
- we always try to aim simplicity and clarity and I think we add in difficulties with those versions
- are unclear to me and I had the feeling that I need glasses (blurry effect)
Ron Oemus It is not possible otherwise. there will always be bodies and lines icons.
same story is Google material:
- WD: the Tokyo theme, because it is so relevant to choose the correct version here also.
- WD: grouping in more I like, the other is to complex
- WD: extra question: do we have to give every grouping also an Icon
- we are still to aim to avoid an icon overload, is it needed to have icons under more?
- we will often show here not common used actions.
- we are still to aim to avoid an icon overload, is it needed to have icons under more?
Ron Oemusall the time the more icon
- WD: I like te version with a outline icon but with a filled extension (Concept 1)
- because the extension is the most important accent
- WD: too much different extensions already
- have to be carefull with X (delete) - (minus) if those are all clear for the users
- but no problem to start it, the user could learn them
- i would minimise the extensions to a minimum for MVP
- not sure which we realy need now
When to show indicator icons on the cards?
- WD: Not sure which I like the most, but one of those:
- show all the time the indicators but only highlight with an extension if needed (Concept1)
- only show the icons with an extension (concept 4)
- but instable view, because can shift place