Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

In this conclusion we summarize the findings of the site "the world we are live in". Basically it is to say that there are two options for the design kit.

1. we build a Design Kit, hard coded, just like all other suppliers. This would mean that every dashboard or boardlet would have to be adapted to all personas. From personas that sit in the office day after day, to personas that jump back and forth between the production line and the interface.
I don't have to explain that this interface is hardly realizable based on the requirements. I think the page "the world we are live in" documents this sufficiently. In the best case it will only look very modest, in the worst case it can only be used with extreme changes in the user interface. Usability and clarity will not find a place there.



The Boardlet  (best Case)
the boardlet must have large inputs and buttons, may only be displayed in the highest contrast range and needs a sidebar, sidetabs, tabs and large buttons to scroll up and down. otherwise the display of all necessary data for all personas is not possible.


2. we develop a system that knows which persona it will use before loading and rendering the interface content.

In the graphic i explain a suggestion how such a system can work. this suggestion enables us to bring usability and clarity into every working process, every persona. the system addresses the individual requirements of each persona in his or her working environment. the table is important here. the more we know the environment the better the interface will be.

The UI/UX team sees the effect of the system as a unique selling point compared to the congruence. Since there is nothing like it on the market yet, global companies save on setup and conversion costs.