You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

Task

TaskTopicDetailsDecisions core team
1
  • animation
when hovering over icon, animation is startedOk for everyone to use the animations from 2 and 4 to avoid the need to create variants per icon
2
  • Indicator Icon with Extensions
  • Action Icons without Extensions
    • shape
    • shape+line
    • line

which version do we prefer about the Icon itself

  • RO: concept 2 and 1 have the most conrtast scope, so the user can clearly differentiate between :enable and :active. concept 2 closes the gap between body and line.
  • WD: like the simplicity of 1 
    • but I don't like the differences between shape, shape+line and line:
      • with this we add again complexity: every new icon: how to color those to keep it consequent?
      • with this we add again inconsequences
        • not every icon follows the same styling and demands making choices in the creation process.
          • going from huge difference in shape  vs small differences in line
  • WD: the propositions 2-3 with shadows
    • are unclear to me and I had the feeling that I need glasses (blurry effect)
    • line objects which shadows are very unclear
    • we always try to aim simplicity and clarity and I think we add in difficulties with those versions

Ron Oemus It is not possible otherwise. there will always be bodies and lines icons.
same story is Google material:


Ron Oemus

3what we should check also within this decision
  • WD: the Tokyo theme, because it is so relevant to choose the correct version here also.

4Grouping
  • WD: grouping in more I like, the other is to complex
  • WD: extra question: do we have to give every grouping also an Icon
    • we are still to aim to avoid an icon overload, is it needed to have icons under more?
      • we will often show here not common used actions.

Ron Oemusall the time the more icon

5Extensions
  • WD: I like te version with a outline icon but with a filled extension (Concept 1)
    • because the extension is the most important accent

6Different extensions
  • WD: too much different extensions already
    • have to be carefull with X (delete) - (minus) if those are all clear for the users
    • but no problem to start it, the user could learn them
    • i would minimise the extensions to a minimum for MVP
      • not sure which we realy need now

7Showing icons on card

When to show indicator icons on the cards?

  • WD: Not sure which I like the most, but one of those:
    • show all the time the indicators but only highlight with an extension if needed (Concept1)
    • only show the icons with an extension (concept 4)
      • but instable view, because can shift place

8Giving error tooltip when hovering over indicatorWD: like the red one




  • No labels